Student athletes should be compensated for their work

Through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, and anything else with a price tag, these athletes are symbols for their school and their program. This directly relates to the initial point that costs would quickly add up.

One of the benefits of work-study programs is that it can supplement the credits earned while supplementing college tuition costs. The point of this is that a scholarship doesn't equal cash in a player's pocket. The first thing opponents say is, "They're already getting a scholarship!

Because the decision makers have the mentality of, "This is the way it's always been. And how in the world would you pay men in a way that wouldn't violate Title IX?

Student-athletes are going to school to learn, and many are lucky enough to do so for reduced cost, given the often generous athletic scholarships. Players like Emmanuel Mudiay, Brandon Jennings, Josh Huestis and Anfernee Simons have all made headlines for their decisions to skip a perfunctory year of college and instead either train exclusively for the NBA Draft or play professionally abroad.

Student athletes should be compensated for their work

The question arises primarily regarding football and basketball student-athletes, since they bring in most of the money. Both players sold memorabilia for relatively small amounts of money. If they did not, it would result in an uproar. A small monthly stipend, enough to cover basic expenses, will suffice in reducing the expenses of athletes. In contrast, a salary will be subjected to federal and state income taxes. This would allow them to introduce these students to financial advisors who had their best interests in mind. It provides another incentive to play. For some institutions, the costs could actually go down. Most other students are not receiving these benefits. Depending on the setup of the program, it could even help athletes graduate with a degree in their chosen faster. In the meantime, college sports will continue to be a billion dollar industry, and athletes will continue to fill its ranks, either as a pathway to the pros or simply a way to exercise their passions. If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. The Olympics took amateurism out of its charter yet the N. Where would the money even come from? For the athletes that do have the ability to play professionally, going to college is a stop on the journey toward a good paycheck.

That's right, football and men's basketball players get paid; lacrosse, field hockey, softball, baseball, soccer players get nothing. To them, introducing pay would be a logistical nightmare, hurting college sports more than helping it.

That leaves little to no time to have a job on campus.

Should college athletes be paid debate

Since most will never play a sport professionally, they actually accumulate debt in school. Aside from equipment access, medical care, scholarships, and travel support, student athletes receive zero compensation for their participation in their chosen support. Another important factor is that many of the athletes come from poor backgrounds. Thus, in comparison, student-athletes already have it easier, financially, than most of the students at their school. These coaches will receive bonuses for getting to the playoffs, winning championships, or breaking school records. If not, what money should be used to pay the baseball players, soccer players and fencers? Many scholarships may offer tuition, room, and board coverage in return for participating in a sport, but not every student athlete qualifies for a scholarship. Both bring a ton of money into their respective universities, and yet were desperate for money.

It is a valid argument because at the end of the year, programs cannot afford to lose money. Williamson fell backward in a split, grabbing his right knee. By definition, paying the athlete would make them a professional.

should college athletes be paid powerpoint
Rated 7/10 based on 35 review
Why College Athletes Should be Paid