Perhaps her novel is as vengeful as the monster who punishes Frankenstein for his selfishness by killing everyone he loves. He not only fails, as already remarked, to distinguish between the formal and the material in other words, the true and the false modality; but when treating of the former he fails to distinguish between the extremely diverse aspects of modality when viewed from the Aristotelian and the Kantian stand-points.
Venkenheim refuses and argues that the creature killed Karl because he felt threatened.
His arrogant belief in his creative powers is deluded. It becomes a factor of enormous importance in more than one history, if you search for it.
You could see Frankenstein as a failed Romantic artist who accidentally invents something new, whose value he cannot see. The brutal curse of Cicero, last year of the Dissertation Republic.
Therefore I deem not the loyalty of the Heathobeards nor the alliance with the Danes secure, or the friendship firm! Venkenheim produces a map, theorizing the monster follows a large herd of caribou and kills in self-defense when he approaches civilization.
As the monster befriends the old man, the other family members return home and immediately fall upon him. After the shock of seeing his monster come alive, Frankenstein decides to have a lie-down. What may follow in the way of inferences as to the physical process of causation by which the stars have been disposed is a question for the Astronomer.
Related post for Last minute book reports frankenstein Recent Posts.